Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Creating Clash

If a team presents a case that is not resolutional and offers no clash to your case, how do you create clash for the debate round?
Posted by at

10 comments:

  1. ktiedeApril 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM

    ask how their case is related to the resolution

    ReplyDelete
  2. A New HeroApril 21, 2009 at 9:35 AM

    point out their case isn't resolutional and spend the rest of the time pulling throw your case. They have to argue something....?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The ARABApril 21, 2009 at 9:58 AM

    start a rumble.................


    no but really you start by stating why your case is resolutional and attack there case like you normally would

    ReplyDelete
  4. rpatinoApril 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM

    I think your kind of discribeing what I did wrong the last Thursday, but like Spencer said point iut that their case is not resolutional and continue to pull through your case.

    ReplyDelete
  5. rpatinoApril 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM

    out

    SORRY

    ReplyDelete
  6. a_mercaApril 21, 2009 at 10:07 AM

    first you would point out the flaw then explain why oviously yours is better because it is resolutional and then since they cant do much ...just attack to win over your judge...
    the end :D :o :I

    ReplyDelete
  7. ♥Morgan♥April 21, 2009 at 11:21 AM

    you would ask how the resolution is related to their case

    ReplyDelete
  8. ttirbcApril 21, 2009 at 3:33 PM

    actually you can create a resolutional clash by asking how they are resolutional

    ReplyDelete
  9. cniggzApril 22, 2009 at 10:05 AM

    first i would explain that they dont clash, or are non-resolutional.
    then i would attack the arguments they present anyway.. and rebuild/buildup my case.

    ReplyDelete
  10. mwilsoApril 22, 2009 at 3:26 PM

    i would say that they're unresolutional then then go from there then i would build up my case

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)